Scientific Research
Scientific Research
Treatment of lower limb gangrene
ISCJELITELJ DOMANCIC – LIJECENJE BIOENERGIJOM
REPORT O ZNANSTVENOJ PROVJERI, Dražen Jakčin
THE HEALER DOMANCIC – TREATMENT WITH BIOENERGY
A SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH REPORT, Dražen Jakčin
In 1984 Zdenko Domančić agreed to test scientifically the effectiveness of his method in patients with diabetic gangrene in Zagreb. Gangrene is a very serious, severe and incurable disease in the classification of conventional medicine, and at the same time, a very good clinical model which quickly show the success or failure of a method. A number of scientific studies have been carried out in laboratory conditions, which have proven the effectiveness of bioenergy and bioenergy therapy.
LOWER LIMB GANGRENE – in the light of modern medicine
Gangrene denotes a pathological dying off (necrosis) of cells. Dry and wet gangrene is distinguished. The cause of dry gangrene is a critically low supply of cells and tissues with oxygen and nutritients due to a damaged circulation. Such a week blood flow is the result of narrowed arteries, among other things due to arteriosclerosis. Most often the disease is linked to diabetes. Smoking, chronic kidney damage, increased
blood pressure, elevated fat and homocysteine levels, lack of physical activity, obesity and family burdens are also associated with the development and progression of arteriosclerosis in the legs. The disease occurs most often in older people, mostly men.
Dry gangrene sufferers, complain of pain in their calves and hips, regardless whether they do not move or take a few steps. In dry gangrene the tissue (of the leg) is cold, red, later it turns black, dries out and the part of the leg affected by gangrene mummifies and falls off. Ulcers with black edges also occur. Most patient also develop a bacterial infection. Wet gangrene is the result of dry gangrene infection, wounds, burns or frostbite when inflammation and swelling exert pressure on arteries, interrupting blood flow to tissues. The interrupted blood flow results in the multiplications of bacteria in the muscles, and because the immune system and the leucocytes function poorly, they can neither prevent nor cure the infection.
Gangrene diagnosis and therapy
The therapy after diagnosis (doppler examination, angiography) is a vasodilation procedure (baloon angioplasty and bypass surgery), which aims to improve blood circulation. In the case of gangrene, the damage of the venous system is so severe that usually all of the above mentioned treatments are out of the question. In terms of pharmacological treatment, conventional medicine offers anticoagulants (e.g. Aspirin), drugs to prevent the progress of arteriosclerosis (statins, vitamin B with increased homocystein value) and other drugs. The improvemt of blood flow is negligible (penthoxyphilin, L-arginine, nitric oxide, prostaglandins and for example vascular endothelial growth factors). Because of the pain patients take analgesics and because of the inflammation antibiotics. The purpose of the surgical treatment (necrectomy) is to remove dead infected tissue or to amputate toes. In patients who are not eliglble for surgery, a treatment in a hyperbaric chamber and compression of the lower limbs can be attempted. The prognosis for gangrene is not good, especially wet gangrene. Due to accompanying diseases, surgical procedures to improve circulation are associated with higher risks. An amputation (removal of a limb) is performed as a last resort, when the patient suffers from pain with lack of movement, the gangrene progresses and the uncontrolled infection spreads. In the USA, according to data of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive System and Kideny Diseases NiDDK, 70.000 leg amputations are performed every year. Over 60% of all non-traumatic amputations of the lower limbs are caused by diabetes mellitus. The prognosis for the survival of the patient is not good, although with dry gangrene better than with wet or gas gangrene. A quarter of patients die of gas gangrene – if they were otherwise healthy and as much as 69% – if they had serious accompanying diseases. To sum up the very big commitment: a lot of effort, medication, procedures and high treatment costs, comparing to a miserable result. Medical textbooks do not mention bioenergy treatment.
LOWER LIMB GANGRENE IN THE LIGHT OF BIOENERGY TREATMENT
A bioenergy therapist of the Zdenko Domančić Method transfers and balances bioenergy in the body. All he needs for a treatment is experience and knowledge, how to transfer bioenergy to the patient with his hands. A bioenergy therapist does not need a scalpel, apparatuses, medical staff or any other help. He also does not need additional diagnostics or treatment. A bioenergy therapist does not interfere with conventional
treatment either, so that the patient continues to take the medication prescribed by doctors.
After bioenergy therapy, the patient’s condition immediately begins to improve. The pain subsides and vanishes, the leg gets warm, the circullation in the capillaries is faster, the wounds heal and the patient can walk the first day after bioenergy therapy. In short, a miraculous treatment! The success of the treatment and the pace of improvement of the patient’s condition also caused astonishment in Dr. Anton Lobnik, a cardiologist and angiologist from the University Clinical Centre in Maribor.
Validation of the effectiveness of the method in Zagreb (1984)
It was the first appearance for Zdenko Domančić in front of a critical group of medical experts from Zagreb and he hoped that the method would be recognised. In order to prove the effectiveness of the bioenergy treament, a group of patients with gangrene, an incurable disease leading to leg amputation or death, was selected. The effects of the treatment were fantastic, all patients started walking, not a single one of them needed amputation. Based on the expert opinion the journalist Dražen Jakčin wrote and published a book in 1986 (The healer Domančić, treatment with bioenergy – A report from the scientific research).
One descriptive event will be useful to assess the effectiveness of the method. Dr. Josip Čiček, an internist, after seeing the results in person, stated: “According to medical knowledge and opinion R.P. should have been dead already, he would have had two days to live at most, and he is still alive, and his condition is even improving! If someone had told me this, i would not have believed it! Either what i have been taught for decades is wrong, or what Zdenko Domančić has achieved is a true miracle!”
THE MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF BIOENERGY TREATMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZDENKO DOMANČIĆ METHOD
The mechanisms of the therapeutic effects of bioenergy have not been clarified. However, since gangrene is the result of a critically disturbed blood circulation, it can be assumed that bioenergy must have improved the blood circulation. Bioenergy also had to have an impact, which cannot be achieved by conventional treatments (procedures, medication). These are only theoretical considerations (hypotheses), by which we try to explain the obvious fact that the patients health has improved.
The hypothetical mechanisms are as follows:
• It is very likely that bioenergy has caused an increase in blood flow and tissue blood supply, since without this, there would be no improvement of the patient’s condition. The question is: On which levels and through which mechanisms of action did this happen? And why are these mechanisms not accessible to conventional treatment? Perhaps the blood flow has increased due to reduced external pressure on the smaller vessels, reduced swelling and inflammation, release of collateral blood circulation, possibly faster development of lateral blood vessels and thus increased circulation. Collateral vessels are numerous small lateral veins through which the blood reaches distants parts of the interrupted artery. In terms of flow capacity, they cannot match or replace te normal basic blood circulation in the uninterrupted artery. In addition, colateral or lateral blood vessels develop slowly as a reaction to repeated or permanent disorders of tissue circulation. Their development takes weeks, months and years. However, it is possible that bioenergy has also effected endovascular changes. Perhaps the blood was affected on an informational level? The best match is a comparison to the improvement of the rheological properties (flow properties) of the blood. The downside of this explanation is that medicines with this effect exist, and yet they are not effective.
• Bioenergy has most likely improved the immune response, reduced swelling and inflammation, which also indirectly affected the improvement of tissue blood supply (tissue perfusion) and accelerated wound cleansing and healing.
•Bioenergy also influences healing through other mechanisms of action, such as effects at the subatomis level, faster chemical reactions, faster and stronger enzymatic reactions, changes in the magnetic field and morphic resonance, changes in the electrical voltage of tissue, increased movement of ions at the cellular level, influences membrane potentials, galvanotaxy, etc.
These are just a few mechanisms of action. However, most importantly, the method is effective. Conventional medicine has difficulties in explaining the effectiveness of bioenergy treatment. Neither was it my aim to explain the heretofore unexplained effects of bioenergy but only to point out the issue. Let us leave the scientific explanations to the scientists.
The discovery of the mechanisms of action of bioenergy is not an academic issue, but a very urgent practical problem for many patients. In Slovenia, for example, half of the deaths each year are caused by cardiovascular diseases. Many patients suffer from angina pectoris, heart attacks or strokes. A practical question arises: How does bioenergy affect these diseases? Many believe in the effectiveness of bioenergy treatment in these specific cases as well. This question is important for the patients, but probably less so for the manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment.
translation: Christoph Mencel
All rights reserved. Any selective or complete quotation of text, copying or use only with sole permission.
(Martyna Fon Zvegelj)
Treatment of lower limb gangrene
ISCJELITELJ DOMANCIC – LIJECENJE BIOENERGIJOM
REPORT O ZNANSTVENOJ PROVJERI, Dražen Jakčin
THE HEALER DOMANCIC – TREATMENT WITH BIOENERGY
A SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH REPORT, Dražen Jakčin
In 1984 Zdenko Domančić agreed to test scientifically the effectiveness of his method in patients with diabetic gangrene in Zagreb. Gangrene is a very serious, severe and incurable disease in the classification of conventional medicine, and at the same time, a very good clinical model which quickly show the success or failure of a method. A number of scientific studies have been carried out in laboratory conditions, which have proven the effectiveness of bioenergy and bioenergy therapy.
LOWER LIMB GANGRENE – in the light of modern medicine
Gangrene denotes a pathological dying off (necrosis) of cells. Dry and wet gangrene is distinguished. The cause of dry gangrene is a critically low supply of cells and tissues with oxygen and nutritients due to a damaged circulation. Such a week blood flow is the result of narrowed arteries, among other things due to arteriosclerosis. Most often the disease is linked to diabetes.
Smoking, chronic kidney damage, increased blood pressure, elevated fat and homocysteine levels, lack of physical activity, obesity and family burdens are also associated with the development and progression of arteriosclerosis in the legs. The disease occurs most often in older people, mostly men.
Dry gangrene sufferers, complain of pain in their calves and hips, regardless whether they do not move or take a few steps. In dry gangrene the tissue (of the leg) is cold, red, later it turns black, dries out and the part of the leg affected by gangrene mummifies and falls off. Ulcers with black edges also occur. Most patient also develop a bacterial infection. Wet gangrene is the result of dry gangrene infection, wounds, burns or frostbite when inflammation and swelling exert pressure on arteries, interrupting blood flow to tissues. The interrupted blood flow results in the multiplications of bacteria in the muscles, and because the immune system and the leucocytes function poorly, they can neither prevent nor cure the infection.
Gangrene diagnosis and therapy
The therapy after diagnosis (doppler examination, angiography) is a vasodilation procedure (baloon angioplasty and bypass surgery), which aims to improve blood circulation. In the case of gangrene, the damage of the venous system is so severe that usually all of the above mentioned treatments are out of the question. In terms of pharmacological treatment, conventional medicine offers anticoagulants (e.g. Aspirin), drugs to prevent the progress of arteriosclerosis (statins, vitamin B with increased homocystein value) and other drugs. The improvemt of blood flow is negligible (penthoxyphilin, L-arginine, nitric oxide, prostaglandins and for example vascular endothelial growth factors). Because of the pain patients take analgesics and because of the inflammation antibiotics. The purpose of the surgical treatment (necrectomy) is to remove dead infected tissue or to amputate toes. In patients who are not eliglble for surgery, a treatment in a hyperbaric chamber and compression of the lower limbs can be attempted. The prognosis for gangrene is not good, especially wet gangrene. Due to accompanying diseases, surgical procedures to improve circulation are associated with higher risks. An amputation (removal of a limb) is performed as a last resort, when the patient suffers from pain with lack of movement, the gangrene progresses and the uncontrolled infection spreads. In the USA, according to data of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive System and Kideny Diseases NiDDK, 70.000 leg amputations are performed every year. Over 60% of all non-traumatic amputations of the lower limbs are caused by diabetes mellitus. The prognosis for the survival of the patient is not good, although with dry gangrene better than with wet or gas gangrene. A quarter of patients die of gas gangrene – if they were otherwise healthy and as much as 69% – if they had serious accompanying diseases. To sum up the very big commitment: a lot of effort, medication, procedures and high treatment costs, comparing to a miserable result. Medical textbooks do not mention bioenergy treatment.
LOWER LIMB GANGRENE IN THE LIGHT OF BIOENERGY TREATMENT
A bioenergy therapist of the Zdenko Domančić Method transfers and balances bioenergy in the body. All he needs for a treatment is experience and knowledge, how to transfer bioenergy to the patient with his hands. A bioenergy therapist does not need a scalpel, apparatuses, medical staff or any other help. He also does not need additional diagnostics or treatment. A bioenergy therapist does not
interfere with conventional treatment either, so that the patient continues to take the medication prescribed by doctors.
After bioenergy therapy, the patient’s condition immediately begins to improve. The pain subsides and vanishes, the leg gets warm, the circullation in the capillaries is faster, the wounds heal and the patient can walk the first day after bioenergy therapy. In short, a miraculous treatment! The success of the treatment and the pace of improvement of the patient’s condition also caused astonishment in Dr. Anton Lobnik, a cardiologist and angiologist from the University Clinical Centre in Maribor.
Validation of the effectiveness of the method in Zagreb (1984)
It was the first appearance for Zdenko Domančić in front of a critical group of medical experts from Zagreb and he hoped that the method would be recognised. In order to prove the effectiveness of the bioenergy treament, a group of patients with gangrene, an incurable disease leading to leg amputation or death, was selected. The effects of the treatment were fantastic, all patients started walking, not a single one of them needed amputation. Based on the expert opinion the journalist Dražen Jakčin wrote and published a book
in 1986 (The healer Domančić, treatment with bioenergy – A report from the scientific research).
One descriptive instant will be useful to assess the effectiveness of the method. Dr. Josip Čiček, an internist, after seeing the results in person, stated: “According to medical knowledge and opinion R.P. should have been dead already, he would have had two days to live at most, and he is still alive, and his condition is even improving! If someone had told me this, i would not have believed it! Either what i have been taught for decades is wrong, or what Zdenko Domančić has achieved is a true miracle!”
THE MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF BIOENERGY TREATMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZDENKO DOMANČIĆ METHOD
The mechanisms of the therapeutic effects of bioenergy have not been clarified. However, since gangrene is the result of a critically disturbed blood circulation, it can be assumed that bioenergy must have improved the blood circulation. Bioenergy also had to have an impact, which cannot be achieved by conventional treatments (procedures,
medication). These are only theoretical considerations (hypotheses), by which we try to explain the obvious fact that the patients health has improved. The hypothetical mechanisms are as follows:
• It is very likely that bioenergy has caused an increase in blood flow and tissue blood supply, since without this, there would be no improvement of the patient’s condition. The question is: On which levels and through which mechanisms of action did this happen? And why are these mechanisms not accessible to conventional treatment? Perhaps the blood flow has increased due to reduced external pressure on the smaller vessels, reduced swelling and inflammation, release of collateral blood circulation, possibly faster development of lateral blood vessels and thus increased circulation. Collateral vessels are numerous small lateral veins through which the blood reaches distants parts of the interrupted artery. In terms of flow capacity, they cannot match or replace te normal basic blood circulation in the uninterrupted artery. In addition, colateral or lateral blood vessels develop slowly as a reaction to repeated or permanent disorders of tissue circulation. Their development takes weeks, months and years. However, it is possible that bioenergy has also effected endovascular changes. Perhaps the blood was affected on an informational level? The best match is a comparison to the improvement of the rheological properties (flow properties) of the blood. The downside of this explanation is that medicines with this effect exist, and yet they are not effective.
• Bioenergy has most likely improved the immune response, reduced swelling and inflammation, which also indirectly affected the improvement of tissue blood supply (tissue perfusion) and accelerated wound cleansing and healing.
•Bioenergy also influences healing through other mechanisms of action, such as effects at the subatomis level, faster chemical reactions, faster and stronger enzymatic reactions, changes in the magnetic field and morphic resonance, changes in the electrical voltage of tissue, increased movement of ions at the cellular level, influences membrane potentials, galvanotaxy, etc.
These are just a few mechanisms of action. However, most importantly, the method is effective. Conventional medicine has difficulties in explaining the effectiveness of bioenergy treatment. Neither was it my aim to explain the heretofore unexplained effects of bioenergy but only to point out the issue. Let us leave the scientific explanations to the scientists.
The discovery of the mechanisms of action of bioenergy is not an academic issue, but a very urgent practical problem for many patients. In Slovenia, for example, half of the deaths each year are caused by cardiovascular diseases. Many patients suffer from angina pectoris, heart attacks or strokes. A practical question arises: How does bioenergy affect these diseases? Many believe in the effectiveness of bioenergy treatment in these specific cases as well. This question is important for the patients, but probably less so for the manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment.
translation: Christoph Mencel
All rights reserved. Any selective or complete quotation of text, copying or use only with sole permission.
(Martyna Fon Zvegelj)
Treatment of lower limb gangrene
ISCJELITELJ DOMANCIC – LIJECENJE BIOENERGIJOM
REPORT O ZNANSTVENOJ PROVJERI, Dražen Jakčin
THE HEALER DOMANCIC – TREATMENT WITH BIOENERGY
A SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH REPORT, Dražen Jakčin
In 1984 Zdenko Domančić agreed to test scientifically the effectiveness of his method in patients with diabetic gangrene in Zagreb. Gangrene is a very serious, severe and incurable disease in the classification of conventional medicine, and at the same time, a very good clinical model which quickly show the success or failure of a method. A number of scientific studies have been carried out in laboratory conditions, which have proven the effectiveness of bioenergy and bioenergy therapy.
LOWER LIMB GANGRENE – in the light of modern medicine
Gangrene denotes a pathological dying off (necrosis) of cells. Dry and wet gangrene is distinguished. The cause of dry gangrene is a critically low supply of cells and tissues with oxygen and nutritients due to a damaged circulation. Such a week blood flow is the result of narrowed arteries, among other things due to arteriosclerosis. Most often the disease is linked to diabetes. Smoking, chronic kidney damage, increased blood pressure, elevated fat and homocysteine levels, lack of physical activity, obesity and family burdens are also associated with the development and progression of arteriosclerosis in the legs. The disease occurs most often in older people, mostly men.
Dry gangrene sufferers, complain of pain in their calves and hips, regardless whether they do not move or take a few steps. In dry gangrene the tissue (of the leg) is cold, red, later it turns black, dries out and the part of the leg affected by gangrene mummifies and falls off. Ulcers with black edges also occur. Most patient also develop a bacterial infection. Wet gangrene is the result of dry gangrene infection, wounds, burns or frostbite when inflammation and swelling exert pressure on arteries, interrupting blood flow to tissues. The interrupted blood flow results in the multiplications of bacteria in the muscles, and because the immune system and the leucocytes function poorly, they can neither prevent nor cure the infection.
Gangrene diagnosis and therapy
The therapy after diagnosis (doppler examination, angiography) is a vasodilation procedure (baloon angioplasty and bypass surgery), which aims to improve blood circulation. In the case of gangrene, the damage of the venous system is so severe that usually all of the above mentioned treatments are out of the question. In terms of pharmacological treatment, conventional medicine offers anticoagulants (e.g. Aspirin), drugs to prevent the progress of arteriosclerosis (statins, vitamin B with increased homocystein value) and other drugs. The improvemt of blood flow is negligible (penthoxyphilin, L-arginine, nitric oxide, prostaglandins and for example vascular endothelial growth factors). Because of the pain patients take analgesics and because of the inflammation antibiotics. The purpose of the surgical treatment (necrectomy) is to remove dead infected tissue or to amputate toes. In patients who are not eliglble for surgery, a treatment in a hyperbaric chamber and compression of the lower limbs can be attempted. The prognosis for gangrene is not good, especially wet gangrene. Due to accompanying diseases, surgical procedures to improve circulation are associated with higher risks. An amputation (removal of a limb) is performed as a last resort, when the patient suffers from pain with lack of movement, the gangrene progresses and the uncontrolled infection spreads. In the USA, according to data of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive System and Kideny Diseases NiDDK, 70.000 leg amputations are performed every year. Over 60% of all non-traumatic amputations of the lower limbs are caused by diabetes mellitus. The prognosis for the survival of the patient is not good, although with dry gangrene better than with wet or gas gangrene. A quarter of patients die of gas gangrene – if they were otherwise healthy and as much as 69% – if they had serious accompanying diseases. To sum up the very big commitment: a lot of effort, medication, procedures and high treatment costs, comparing to a miserable result. Medical textbooks do not mention bioenergy treatment.
LOWER LIMB GANGRENE IN THE LIGHT OF BIOENERGY TREATMENT
A bioenergy therapist of the Zdenko Domančić Method transfers and balances bioenergy in the body. All he needs for a treatment is experience and knowledge, how to transfer bioenergy to the patient with his hands. A bioenergy therapist does not need a scalpel, apparatuses, medical staff or any other help. He also does not need additional diagnostics or treatment. A bioenergy therapist does not interfere with conventional treatment either, so that the patient continues to take the medication prescribed by doctors.
After bioenergy therapy, the patient’s condition immediately begins to improve. The pain subsides and vanishes, the leg gets warm, the circullation in the capillaries is faster, the wounds heal and the patient can walk the first day after bioenergy therapy. In short, a miraculous treatment! The success of the treatment and the pace of improvement of the patient’s condition also caused astonishment in Dr. Anton Lobnik, a cardiologist and angiologist from the University Clinical Centre in Maribor.
Validation of the effectiveness of the method in Zagreb (1984)
It was the first appearance for Zdenko Domančić in front of a critical group of medical experts from Zagreb and he hoped that the method would be recognised. In order to prove the effectiveness of the bioenergy treament, a group of patients with gangrene, an incurable disease leading to leg amputation or death, was selected. The effects of the treatment were fantastic, all patients started walking, not a single one of them needed amputation. Based on the expert opinion the journalist Dražen Jakčin wrote and published a book in 1986 (The healer Domančić, treatment with bioenergy – A report from the scientific research).
One descriptive instant will be useful to assess the effectiveness of the method. Dr. Josip Čiček, an internist, after seeing the results in person, stated: “According to medical knowledge and opinion R.P. should have been dead already, he would have had two days to live at most, and he is still alive, and his condition is even improving! If someone had told me this, i would not have believed it! Either what i have been taught for decades is wrong, or what Zdenko Domančić has achieved is a true miracle!”
THE MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF BIOENERGY TREATMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZDENKO DOMANČIĆ METHOD
The mechanisms of the therapeutic effects of bioenergy have not been clarified. However, since gangrene is the result of a critically disturbed blood circulation, it can be assumed that bioenergy must have improved the blood circulation. Bioenergy also had to have an impact, which cannot be achieved by conventional treatments (procedures, medication). These are only theoretical considerations (hypotheses), by which we try to explain the obvious fact that the patients health has improved. The hypothetical mechanisms are as follows:
• It is very likely that bioenergy has caused an increase in blood flow and tissue blood supply, since without this, there would be no improvement of the patient’s condition. The question is: On which levels and through which mechanisms of action did this happen? And why are these mechanisms not accessible to conventional treatment? Perhaps the blood flow has increased due to reduced external pressure on the smaller vessels, reduced swelling and inflammation, release of collateral blood circulation, possibly faster development of lateral blood vessels and thus increased circulation. Collateral vessels are numerous small lateral veins through which the blood reaches distants parts of the interrupted artery. In terms of flow capacity, they cannot match or replace te normal basic blood circulation in the uninterrupted artery. In addition, colateral or lateral blood vessels develop slowly as a reaction to repeated or permanent disorders of tissue circulation. Their development takes weeks, months and years. However, it is possible that bioenergy has also effected endovascular changes. Perhaps the blood was affected on an informational level? The best match is a comparison to the improvement of the rheological properties (flow properties) of the blood. The downside of this explanation is that medicines with this effect exist, and yet they are not effective.
• Bioenergy has most likely improved the immune response, reduced swelling and inflammation, which also indirectly affected the improvement of tissue blood supply (tissue perfusion) and accelerated wound cleansing and healing.
•Bioenergy also influences healing through other mechanisms of action, such as effects at the subatomis level, faster chemical reactions, faster and stronger enzymatic reactions, changes in the magnetic field and morphic resonance, changes in the electrical voltage of tissue, increased movement of ions at the cellular level, influences membrane potentials, galvanotaxy, etc.
These are just a few mechanisms of action. However, most importantly, the method is effective. Conventional medicine has difficulties in explaining the effectiveness of bioenergy treatment. Neither was it my aim to explain the heretofore unexplained effects of bioenergy but only to point out the issue. Let us leave the scientific explanations to the scientists.
The discovery of the mechanisms of action of bioenergy is not an academic issue, but a very urgent practical problem for many patients. In Slovenia, for example, half of the deaths each year are caused by cardiovascular diseases. Many patients suffer from angina pectoris, heart attacks or strokes. A practical question arises: How does bioenergy affect these diseases? Many believe in the effectiveness of bioenergy treatment in these specific cases as well. This question is important for the patients, but probably less so for the manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment.
translation: Christoph Mencel
All rights reserved. Any selective or complete quotation of text, copying or use only with sole permission.
(Martyna Fon Zvegelj)